Quantcast Set of 4 Mencoder Tests: Mind Loaning Us Some CPU Cycles? - digitalFAQ.com Forums [Archives]
  #1  
03-20-2004, 04:26 PM
bilu bilu is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a PIII-500 laptop with performances between 5 and 7 fps using Mencoder.
So I'm asking for your help to make 4 tests with 30 minutes samples!

Your feedback we'll be valuable to all of those who will be making 1-pass encodes

Use my build: http://clientes.netvisao.pt/bilu/bru...r20040310a.zip

And follow instructions (if needed) here: http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9300

BATCH
====
Quote:
PAL: mencoder -include settings.ini -lavcopts keyint=15 movie.vob -o movie.m2v
NTSC: mencoder -include settings.ini -vf-pre softpulldown -lavcopts keyint=18 movie.vob -o movie.m2v
SETTINGS.INI
========
Common framework:
Quote:
of=rawvideo=1
ovc=lavc=1
nosound=1
noskip=1
lavcopts=vcodec=mpeg2video:vrc_buf_size=1835:
vqblur=0reme=2recmp=2:vqcomp=1:vrc_minrate=300 :
intra_matrix=8,9,12,22,26,27,29,34,9,10,14,26,27,
29,34,37,12,14,18,27,29,34,37,38,22,26,27,31,36,
37,38,40,26,27,29,36,39,38,40,48,27,29,34,37,38,
40,48,58,29,34,37,38,40,48,58,69,34,37,38,40,48,
58,69,79:inter_matrix=16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,18,
20,22,24,26,28,30,32,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,22
,24,26,30,32,32,34,36,24,26,28,32,34,34,36,38,26,
28,30,32,34,36,38,40,28,30,32,34,36,38,42,42,30,
32,34,36,38,40,42,44:vrc_maxrate=9800:
Depending on source:
Quote:
ildct=1:ilme=1:vstrict=-1:ildctcmp=2:
vmax_b_frames=2:
autoaspect=1:

Brown: Doesn't work with interlaced or telecined sources.
Blue: Needed for interlaced and NTSC encodes.
Red: Only when using VOB/M2V sources directly.
If source is not VOB/M2V use aspect=4/3 or aspect=16/9.
Settings to test:
Quote:
vbitrate=9800:
scplx_mask=0.3:
naq=1:

Orange: Spatial Complexity Mask.
Green:Average Bitrate.
Violet: Normalize Adaptive Quantization. Used with *_mask settings, naq will attempt to adjust the per-MB quantizers to maintain the proper average.
The set of tests needs to be run over streams with at least 30 minutes duration.

VB ->vbitrate
SCP -> scplx_mask=0.3
NAQ -> naq

1) VB=1000
2) VB=1000:SCP
3) VB=9800:SCP
4) VB=1000:SCP:NAQ

1) See if it starts lowering the quantizers as the stream goes trying to fit into the avg bitrate;

2) and 3) See if the spatial mask helps fitting into the avg bitrate or if it doesn't even care and just lowers when it can;

4) See if naq helps fitting into the avg bitrate when you're using *_mask;

The results should be analised in Bitrate Viewer.

Thanks in advance,
Bilu
Reply With Quote
Someday, 12:01 PM
admin's Avatar
Site Staff / Ad Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 42
Thanks: ∞
Thanked 42 Times in 42 Posts
  #2  
03-21-2004, 11:22 AM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bilu,
...nice idea, hope more people will test and post with us .
Some of these have been done... I'll look for my tests (all over my poor hard disk) and see if worth post them (since they were done on small tests about 3 min long ).
Come on, join us.

About the common framework, I would also include in tests vmax_b_frames=2 for progressive sources, if you agree. And for really fast PC (not mine , even is not bad at all) I would recommend to test trell=1:cbp=1:mv0=1. But you give the directions, not to complicate too much the tests.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
03-21-2004, 02:07 PM
rds_correia rds_correia is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeap,
Nice going bilu.
I wish I had a better CPU on my PC so I could help.
I even wish I had a better CPU for brains
The thing is my CPU is a PIII 550.

Off-topic:
I'm a communication technician and I work mainly with Avaya Systems.
Though, I have more than 10 years of experience working on the PC repairing business,
both hardware and software installation.
Not to mention that before I started "working" I had been kidding with PCs for more than a decade.
One thing I always recommended (and still recommend) to my customers is having everything
backed up on a weekly basis and always keep the Firewall and AntiVirus updated on a daily basis.
Now my windows box that has been intruded 3 times this week-end by some meat-head that has
nothing better to do...
On Friday I went to my Parent's and left the PC turned on.
When I came back home at night my PC had crashed and had to repair some files on startup.
I thought: ok they've found a way to break through BlackICE Defender.
No big deal, they had launched a patch on that evening.
On Saturday I left my PC working on some tests with mencoder and went to the movies.
When I got back BlackICE was stalled and this time I had to reinstall WinXP Pro.
I had just reinstalled XP + BlackICE (with the Patch) + PC Cillin 2004 (with the updates) when
I received a phone call from a customer, on a week-end
I came back home around 4AM and I thought: if the race in Malasia is starting at 7AM
there's no point in going to bed now.
Might as well run some tests with mencoder and update the newbie guide
Ok, this time they screwed up the NTFS 5.1 partitioning so bad I couldn't recover anything.
Know what? I had zillions of bytes on my second, just bought 2nd hand 40GB HardDrive.
Know what, again? Hadn't had time to back it up yet so now I'm empty
I don't even have the firewall, so if I try to download it the bad m*th*r fu***rs are going to
attack me before I can download it.
So I'm reduced to a Mandrake 9.2 that I had lying around on a couple of CDs.
No way sh0dan has ported Avisynth to Linux yet, right
This way I'll only be able to do anything next week-end...
Cheers guys
__________________
Rui
Reply With Quote
  #4  
03-21-2004, 04:00 PM
bilu bilu is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitall.doc
About the common framework, I would also include in tests vmax_b_frames=2 for progressive sources, if you agree. And for really fast PC (not mine , even is not bad at all) I would recommend to test trell=1:cbp=1:mv0=1. But you give the directions, not to complicate too much the tests.
@digitall.doc
It's better not to overload other people PC's , even if they're fast

@all
If you want to test with B-frames, please make sure that your sources are progressive. Interlaced or telecined sources are not supported.


Bilu
Reply With Quote
  #5  
03-21-2004, 11:16 PM
kwag kwag is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 13,537
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rds_correia
I thought: ok they've found a way to break through BlackICE Defender.
They sure did
Look at this: http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=2474024

-kwag
Reply With Quote
  #6  
03-30-2004, 03:26 PM
rds_correia rds_correia is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chinese Democracy starts now!
Posts: 2,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah...
I just found out too late ...
I'm definitly going on a different direction now.
I've got an old PII233 with 64Mb and a 3Gb harddrive and I got my hands on two 3COM NICs.
I'm downloading smoothwall as per Karl's information on a different thread.
I'll make it my proxy/firewall.
The only prob seems to be the extra noise in the room 'cause of the power supply fans...
Oh well nothing's ever perfect for me any way
Untill I find a way (read time) to install I'll be online for very short periods of time
Hope I can revisit you guys on the weekend.
You know I found a tool called Easy Recover from Ontrack whish aided me to recover
some of my work but most of it has vanished.
And the tool is quite expensive, but so are the data recovery expert companies here in Portugal
Cheers
__________________
Rui
Reply With Quote
  #7  
03-30-2004, 03:35 PM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Bilu you know what:

I did encode a fieldblended capture of Independence Day (PAL) using mencoder but NOT set to interlaced encoding! (testing) Therefore that means an interlaced/fieldBased source encoded at crazy progressive setting defaults!
The resulted stream I did just treat using Restream (as always I do use on ready encoded ffvfw or mencoder encodings) resetting timestamps and did set the flags to "interlaced" but still ZigZag-scan! keeped and also set to TopFieldFirst flag.

The result was ...... NICE!
(I did a test, thats why I did that totally unconventional way)

BitrateViewer ended up ok. right AVG, peaks where ok, a Q curve in a way how it has to be (almost, but not mention how FAR better then CCE,TmpgEnc)..... and GOP was normal set and outputted using 2 B-Frames.
(when CCE already produces a Q of 4-5, in the same part mencoder still uses about 3-4 at same endfile size)

Compared to CCE (alternateScan/interlaced settings) it resulted BETTER!
On Tv ... *love*

We never will estimate the "behavior" of that mencoder or ffvfw

almost every Kdvd encoding I do now using mencoder and the slicer() function for prediction and afterwards "massage" using Restream Im really impressed.


PS: The quick and fast way using "settings.ini" I didn't knew before, .... where has to be that .ini placed?? In the same folder as mencoder.exe or where the .bat file exists?? It can be used and shared like a Template (like you do it right now above)


I apologize that I didn't followed the mencoder "threads" that much, but once getting out, it needed a very concentrated reading to get in again
Reply With Quote
  #8  
03-30-2004, 04:58 PM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hi inc,
nice again to see you around here testing mencoder.
The *.ini files are usually in mplayer folder, where you put codecs.conf file that vmesquita found for us.
But I think the important thing is that you point at the ini file in mencoder command-line through -include setting:
Code:
mencoder ... -include D:\...\mplayer\setDVDHQ.ini ...
Hope you will be with us more time, helping to understand this nice encoder. Since the output is really good. And, since is based in ffmpeg, it will take advantage of ffmpeg improvements (now they're working in rate control, as bilu informed us)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
03-31-2004, 04:37 AM
bilu bilu is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
Bilu you know what:

I did encode a fieldblended capture of Independence Day (PAL) using mencoder but NOT set to interlaced encoding! (testing) Therefore that means an interlaced/fieldBased source encoded at crazy progressive setting defaults!
The resulted stream I did just treat using Restream (as always I do use on ready encoded ffvfw or mencoder encodings) resetting timestamps and did set the flags to "interlaced" but still ZigZag-scan! keeped and also set to TopFieldFirst flag.

The result was ...... NICE!
(I did a test, thats why I did that totally unconventional way)
No need for alternate scan if you use ildct, zigzag is fine :
http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=67365#67365

Seems that B-frames work nicely with interlaced encodes, just not when switching between interlaced and progressive:
http://neuron2.net/ipw-web/bulletin/...pic.php?p=3164

Quote:
almost every Kdvd encoding I do now using mencoder and the slicer() function for prediction and afterwards "massage" using Restream Im really impressed.
I've got to read more about that slicer().
But it's good to know that the AVG was OK

Can you post the command-line you used?


Bilu
Reply With Quote
  #10  
03-31-2004, 06:57 AM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi bilu,
nice to see you back to forums!.

I've been reading around but didn't see much changes in this mencoder thing. Also looked for advances in ffmpeg related to rate control, but didn't find anything. Do you have news?.

About ping-pong prediction, it's very interesting. The tests I did where done with slices I obtained with this slicer method. You can begin reading this thread: http://www.kvcd.net/forum/viewtopic....ight=ping+pong
It has almost all info about the method.

It's fine we can focus on prediction, since that means that mencodings are more tuned... isn't it?.
I saw a post in doom9, where they advised settings very similar to what we did here.

BTW, how were your tests with authoring?. Did you try DVDauthor?, did you use the GUI?.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
03-31-2004, 07:57 AM
bilu bilu is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I won't post much until there are some real news.

Meanwhile I uploaded a sample stream to the FFMPEG guys so they can check the interlaced/progressive B-frame problem.

I posted this now at FFMPEG, maybe Michael speeds things up

Quote:
Michael Niedermayer wrote:

> we need per MB ratecontrol for small vbv buffer sizes and CBR, iam currently
> working on rewriting the ratecontrol code

Just to say that the guys at Doom9 and KVCD are a bit anxious to see this...
For the first time Windows users will have a nice and free alternative to CCE that is faster than TMPGEnc



Thanks for your work,
Bruno
There's not much more I can do at the moment.
And life has other things too

I need to look for my health: 27 yrs old, 1,76 mt, 110 kg

I'm going to start making cardio-fitness today on a gym near home.
2 times a week for now, other days at a swimming pool right next to the gym.
I haven't made exercise for years

So instead of bringing the work laptop home ( my own desktop has a burned motherboard and it's time for a real upgrade, but money has other priorities) I'll post at work when possible and avoid computing at home, at least for a while.

So at least until ratecontrol is fixed, no predictions or authoring for me

Of course I'll allways help others with libavcodec, I can benefit from their experience too


Bilu
Reply With Quote
  #12  
03-31-2004, 10:16 AM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilu
I won't post much until there are some real news.
You've been always a prudent person, but we all lose without your comments
Quote:
So at least until ratecontrol is fixed, no predictions or authoring for me
again
Quote:
There's not much more I can do at the moment.
And life has other things too
Of course, you're right. You have to take care of your health, we all should .

Can you point us where can we keep informed of ffmpeg advances? Where did you post the interest on ffmpeg at KVCD?

Hope you'll enjoy your new activities, and feel better friend!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
03-31-2004, 10:29 AM
bilu bilu is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitall.doc
You've been always a prudent person, but we all lose without your comments
(...)
Can you point us where can we keep informed of ffmpeg advances? Where did you post the interest on ffmpeg at KVCD?
I'll still be here a lot, just not as much at night

And I already posted about FFMPEG advances, but I'll do it again:

Mailing list archive (better would be to subscribe of course):
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/f...?forum_id=1506

libavcodec CVS, ordered by date descending:
http://www1.mplayerhq.hu/cgi-bin/cvs...eg&sortby=date


Bilu
Reply With Quote
  #14  
03-31-2004, 10:49 AM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilu
And I already posted about FFMPEG advances, but I'll do it again
Thanx pal, I missed your previous post.

I'll go there and see, and as you advise, maybe I'll also subscribe (I don't do this usually since I think I have very little to offer This is the only forum I'm subscribed, but here people is so charm and patient...)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
03-31-2004, 03:49 PM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilu
Can you post the command-line you used?
Well its very simple:
(if I do choose the properties of my mencoder.exe it says buildet at 27. November 2003 and modified at 9. Dezember 2003. It seems to be the one when Vmesquita came up here with his makeAVIs for mencoder Guide)

The .bat file:
Code:
set VideoStream=encoding  ### The name of the avi file in the same directory as this .bat file
mencoder -include H:\xxxxxxx.ini -lavcopts keyint=15:aspect=4/3:vbitrate=2200:vrc_maxrate=8000:vqmin=1:vqmax=3 %VideoStream%.avi -o %VideoStream%.mpg
bbdmux %VideoStream%.mpg 0xe0 %VideoStream%.m2v
del %VideoStream%.mpg"
pause
The .ini file:
Code:
of=mpeg=1
ovc=lavc=1
nosound=1
noskip=1 
forceidx=1
lavcopts=vcodec=mpeg2video:
vrc_buf_size=1835:
vmax_b_frames=2:
vlelim=-4:vcelim=-4:mbd=0:
intra_matrix=8,9,12,22,26,27,29,34,9,10,14,26,
27,29,34,37,12,14,18,27,29,34,37,38,22,26,27,
31,36,37,38,40,26,27,29,36,39,38,40,48,27,29,
34,37,38,40,48,58,29,34,37,38,40,48,58,69,34,
37,38,40,48,58,69,79:
inter_matrix=16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,18,20,22,
24,26,28,30,32,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,22,24,
26,30,32,32,34,36,24,26,28,32,34,34,36,38,26,
28,30,32,34,36,38,40,28,30,32,34,36,38,42,42,
30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44:
vb_qfactor=0.7:vi_qfactor=0.8:vqblur=0.3
(nope thats not Notch, its an own matrix composition which filters more on high frequencies and so I didnt applied DCTFilter() in my avs script,
BTW that of=rawvideo=1 doesn't work for me so I still have to do the demultiplex way)

So as you see I do not use Trellis etc. .....

I did just a test this evening on "Road to perdition" where I did set
vbitrate=1000:vrc_maxrate=2200:vqmin=1:vqmax=4

... and that came out:
(source was an already SHRINKED DVD! pics in jpeg 60% Quality)
Movie video Stream final size was 840MB! (just for testing)
Ok, that movie got much dark, but .... hell therefore that less MBs at 704x576 @ 25fps, therefore you can assume what comes out if I give an encoding more room to breath if I for example do encode finally to lets say 1900MBs so 2 Movies will fit on one DVD-R.

Fast motion:
Encoding:


Source:


No motion:
Encoding:


Source:


The avs script:
Code:
mpeg2source("H:\RoadToPerdition\perdition.d2v")
BlindPP(cpu=4)
Undot()
Stmedianfilter(3,3,1,1)
BicubicResize(704,352,1/3,1/3,20,0,648,432)
AddBorders(0,112,0,112).letterbox(0,0,16,16)
Converttoyuy2()
#Slicer(2,15,05,2,0)
Also here just simple - no MA, just spatial and minimal Temporal filtering
Reply With Quote
  #16  
03-31-2004, 04:15 PM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nice script incredible.
I'm curious about some things:
- Are you doing KDVD?. I guess not, from aspect 4:3, and from vrc_maxrate=2200. I suppose you're doing SKVCD (well, SVCD in this case, or better "SIncVCD" ). How is the output?. Wouldn't it be better to use MA script for SKVCD output?.
- I see you make use of vqmin=1 (that in man_page is not advised), and vqmax=4. Doesn't it force too high (but below 2200) bitrates, since Q can't be raised?. What are the figures you get in BitrateViewer?. Have you tried also vqmin=2?, what are the differences in file size and Q and bitrate values?. Wouldn't it be also advisable to use mbqmin=1 and lmin=1?. Just curious about the effects of a vqmin=1 value.
- Are you feeding mencoder with makeavis?
- Have you tried bilu compilation of mencoder?. It works fine, and you have the advantage that don't need to demux the output file.
- I also advise you (just try and see if you like more) to use mbd=2 (better quality) and vqblur=0 (Q changes sharply when needed)

Till now I didn't try to make a SKVCD with mencoder, but I had it in the to do list: to backup my DVD in a single CD, in MPEG2 format with mencoder. Through your test I see it maybe possible.

EDIT: I'm telling lies: I tried once to do a 1 CD SKVCD encoding (Spirit was the film) but didn't like the output. But I also was using other parameters then... I have to try and redo it.
EDIT2: I see you edited your post. rawvideo just works with bilu compilation.
EDIT3: I also see that you're using a vrc_buf_size=1835, so you intended a KDVD... Then maybe would be better to raise bitrates... Give it a try with vrc_maxrate=8000 and vbitrate between 5000 and 8000.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
03-31-2004, 04:31 PM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitall.doc
Nice script incredible.
I'm curious about some things:
- Are you doing KDVD?. I guess not, from aspect 4:3, and from vrc_maxrate=2200. I suppose you're doing SKVCD (well, SVCD in this case, or better "SIncVCD" ). How is the output?. Wouldn't it be better to use MA script for SKVCD output?.
Well above you see my rugular KDVD script and below I did a test for a Xsvcd Well I didn't use any compex routines in here as the movie already gains from big darknes where already a good compression comes out so MA would even give more compression, but on the other hand it would be more blurred.
Quote:
- I see you make use of vqmin=1 (that in man_page is not advised), and vqmax=4. Doesn't it force too high (but below 2200) bitrates, since Q can't be raised?. What are the figures you get in BitrateViewer?. Have you tried also vqmin=2?, what are the differences in file size and Q and bitrate values?.
Well you're right, I should change that but my Q curve is nice and keeps almost in avg at 2-3 (in that xsvcd sample) in DVD where I do give even more AVG bitrate the Q curve behaves at 2 in average
Quote:
Wouldn't it be also advisable to use mbqmin=1 and lmin=1?. Just curious about the effects of a vqmin=1 value.
As I told, I didnt read all the past mencoder postings so thats a bit new information to me *lol as I till now ended up very nice with that above
Quote:
- Are you feeding mencoder with makeavis?
Yep!
Quote:
- Have you tried bilu compilation of mencoder?. It works fine, and you have the advantage that don't need to demux the output file.
Nope till now not but I will do! Thanks for the hint! (gimme the link please)
Quote:
- I also advise you (just try and see if you like more) to use mbd=2 (better quality) and vqblur=0 (Q changes sharply when needed)
Ill test that !
Quote:
Till now I didn't try to make a SKVCD with mencoder, but I had it in the to do list: to backup my DVD in a single CD, in MPEG2 format with mencoder. Through your test I see it maybe possible.
EDIT: I'm telling lies: I tried once to do a 1 CD SKVCD encoding (Spirit was the film) but didn't like the output. But I also was using other parameters then... I have to try and redo it.
Well I already did some KsVCDs even uisng ffvfw so its possible BUT that above is a nice compressable movie ... I just got the screenshots where you can assume what will come out if AVG is set much higher to end up with a DVD containing two Movies.
And thats in regular my way ... also to set mencoder to 16/9 .. that 4/3 was from another 3h movie where I had to decide and I did choose non-anamorph but therefore better Quality

I see now your edits:
The VBV Buffer is right in the bat above for DVD purposes ... in the Xsvcd encoding below I choosed the half and ended up with 112VBV in real

I think it was a bit confusing, to show my kDVD settings ABOVE and below showing the tweaking(incl. parameters switched) to obtain a Xsvcd encoding! Shame on me

And ... when used that simpel avs a FPS of 35! encoding speed came out (Athlon XP overclocked)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
04-01-2004, 05:07 AM
digitall.doc digitall.doc is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia (España)
Posts: 741
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
And ... when used that simpel avs a FPS of 35! encoding speed came out (Athlon XP overclocked)
Pheeeeewwww
With my settings, with trell and mbd=2 and so, with MA script, and a P4 1400 I just get 6-7 fps

Quote:
Nope till now not but I will do! Thanks for the hint! (gimme the link please)
You can download from here (don't know if it still works. If not, ask bilu):
http://clientes.netvisao.pt/bilu/bru...r20040310a.zip

Quote:
I think it was a bit confusing, to show my kDVD settings ABOVE and below showing the tweaking(incl. parameters switched) to obtain a Xsvcd encoding! Shame on me
No, don't worry, I understood perfectly your post. My comments were just to make sure I understood your method, and to suggest you some things that maybe can improve your output. The vbitrate=vrc_maxrate approach suggested by bilu gives a nice output (I compared with vbitrate=5000 and vrc_maxrate=8000 vs vbitrate=vrc_maxrate=8000, and where quite similar, with higher bitrates in the second test, and maybe slightly beter, no blocks at all)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
04-01-2004, 11:08 AM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitall.doc
Quote:
Originally Posted by incredible
And ... when used that simpel avs a FPS of 35! encoding speed came out (Athlon XP overclocked)
Pheeeeewwww
With my settings, with trell and mbd=2 and so, with MA script, and a P4 1400 I just get 6-7 fps
Thats cause Im runnin actually my Athlon at ca. 2320mhz ...
Quote:
Quote:
Nope till now not but I will do! Thanks for the hint! (gimme the link please)
You can download from here (don't know if it still works. If not, ask bilu):
http://clientes.netvisao.pt/bilu/bru...r20040310a.zip
Link works perfect!
Quote:
Quote:
I think it was a bit confusing, to show my kDVD settings ABOVE and below showing the tweaking(incl. parameters switched) to obtain a Xsvcd encoding! Shame on me
No, don't worry, I understood perfectly your post. My comments were just to make sure I understood your method, and to suggest you some things that maybe can improve your output. The vbitrate=vrc_maxrate approach suggested by bilu gives a nice output (I compared with vbitrate=5000 and vrc_maxrate=8000 vs vbitrate=vrc_maxrate=8000, and where quite similar, with higher bitrates in the second test, and maybe slightly beter, no blocks at all)
Well if the output can even be improved, ... well .. lets see

I didn't followed that "vbitrate=vrc_maxrate" thing ... whats that about?
I know what it means, but what are the resumeés in your testings?

Maybe we should do a new Thread ONLY containing well successfull mencoder parameters .... maybe something like different .bat quotings using names like xxx1.ba, xxx2.bat so we can refer to them in that thread like phil doses with his optimal scripts, means if someone gots a very useful new .bat change, we can post it there incl. ecplanation and give it the next number.

BTW:
How can I put a fake-line break in the .bat command like in Avisynth where you can put a "\" so the engine doesnt read the linebreak.

Uops, I think bilu's subject of this threat went totally out of topic!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
04-01-2004, 12:01 PM
incredible incredible is offline
Free Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to incredible
Digi.doc ....

maybe you already discussed this but as I didn't read every posting in the mencoder thread there ... here a little point of view of mine according to aggressive bitrate peaks (still theoretic but should be testet) :

As we know that mencoder very much keeps the encoding within the settet Vqmin and Vqmax this means for example on a mega complex input scene even a Vqmax of 3 would result in a peak blow up in the bitrate.
Example ... I did recognise when I was encoding "the sixth sense" that there was ONE scene where the picture focussed on a running TV where no program was running (you remember that from "Poltergeist" .... that TV full of snow night-picture after the national anthem?) ok, .... so the Q wasn't getting over 3 BUT therefore the Bitrate startet like a rocket up to 12000! kbit ... my player plays it so that was luck or cause its just a 2sec scene where you dont recognise a stuttering at that TV-snow-only passage.
So Vqblur in mencoder seems to me like a flatpriority in CCE or elsewhere.
Means IF you set a higher Q dynamic even at Vqmax=4 thia would mean you will have a more dynamic Q curve which makes sense as on such mentioned mega high complex scenes you wont recognise worse quality if just a Q level one step above is used.

So best would be to make tests on a special sliced Source, where a wide range of dynamics is included which would cause extreme bitrate falls (credits etc.) and also which do cause extreme bitrate risings (TV-Snow, waterfall, sunreflectios on auneasy watersurface, flashing diamond sparcles). If using such a source input of approx. 10minutes we could find the right average out of Vqmin/VQmax and especially the VQblur.

Reply With Quote
Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raw avi files for tests? Prodater64 Video Encoding and Conversion 2 01-09-2005 12:51 PM
Crazy idea just poped into my mind! kwag Avisynth Scripting 49 04-29-2004 05:04 PM
Mencoder: Extensive tests without vrc_minrate bilu Video Encoding and Conversion 21 04-13-2004 03:54 AM
AAC audio tests GFR Audio Conversion 1 06-18-2003 01:28 PM
KDVD PAL tests Tachyon Video Encoding and Conversion 0 06-16-2002 04:03 AM

Thread Tools



 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM  —  vBulletin © Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd